WebMEDLINE Complete is a leading full-text database of biomedical and health journals, providing full text for thousands of top medical journals with cover-to-cover indexing. Malpass A, Carel H, Ridd M, Shaw A, Kessler D, Sharp D, et al. Next, we examined the extent to which those who used MEDLINE also reported changes in patient care and avoided adverse events as a result of the information they obtained in their searches. Background: d. MEDLINE has more than 500 Evidence-Based Care Sheets, whereas CINAHL has more than 50 Evidence-Based Care Sheets. 2015 Nov 20;4:169. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0128-x. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study. official website and that any information you provide is encrypted Results: A literature review (German). Article Your privacy choices/Manage cookies we use in the preference centre. MEDLINE as a source of just-in-time answers to clinical questions. 2009;18(4):2130. -, Flemming K, Briggs M. Electronic searching to locate qualitative research: evaluation of three strategies. CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) ERIC (Education Resources Information Center) PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database) On the other hand, MEDLINE contains a much better developed collection of scope notes for its subject heading (MeSH) terms, which can assist development of the search strategy. and transmitted securely. We recommend CINAHL as a good starting Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited. Overall, 47% of relevant references were available in the students' own library, and 64% could be obtained within 48 hours. The median % of unique studies was 9.09 %; while the range had a lowest value of 5.0 % to the highest value of 33.0 %. 2005 Jan;58(1):20-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.06.001. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in AccessLibrary and Research Help tutorials. Gray Comprehensive coverage of English-language publications in nursing and allied health professions. 2011;17(2):11926. The CINAHL Databases - Frequently Asked Questions One study by Subirana et al. CINAHL and PubMedare often searched for similar material, so this guide presents concepts essential to both. Before Where once physicians found barriers in accessing health information [1], there is now a much greater availability of information resources [2]. It was also one of the most commonly consulted resources when specific adverse events were avoided; MEDLINE was the first or second most frequently used resource, after journals, in ten of the twelve possible adverse events. The literature searches retrieved a total of 27,920 records before deduplication with a large number (13,209) identified from CINAHL. 2012;19(3):494503. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Given the tendency of respondents to consult several resources to answer a clinical question, the clinical questions reported by these respondents are likely not fact based but rather are complex and require the synthesis of information across multiple resources. WebMedline and CINAHL are bibliographic databases for searching the journal literature, and are just two of the many databases available. Jonnalagadda SR, Del Fiol G, Medlin R, Weir C, Fiszman M, Mostafa J, Liu H. Automatically extracting sentences from Medline citations to support clinicians information needs. J Adv Nurs. Spaeder JA. Of particular interest to health sciences librarians is our finding that clinicians who used more information resources reported making more changes to patient care and avoided more adverse events as a result of the information obtained in their searches. [68] describes this as Their intention is not to identify all literature on a particular topic. The three 2016 Feb 9;5:27. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0197-5. However, CINAHL also included the following thesaurus terms not available in MeSH: discourse analysis, content analysis, ethnographic research, ethnological research, ethnonursing research, constant comparative method, qualitative validity, purposive sample, observational methods, field studies, theoretical sample, phenomenology, phenomenological research, life experiences and cluster sample. FOIA 2005 Jan;58(1):20-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.06.001. Radiography. Google Scholar. Accessibility Examining available publication-type tags and thesaurus terms can provide more information about database coverage and help in the choice of databases to search. PubMed Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Abstract The purpose of this research was to determine which of three databases, CINAHL, EMBASE or MEDLINE, should be accessed when researching nursing Hunt S, Cimino JJ, Koziol DE. In this case study, seven bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, British Nursing Index (BNI), Social Science Citation Index (SSCI), ASSIA and PsycINFO) were searched using three different strategiesone consisting of thesaurus terms, the second composed of free-text terms and the third using broad-based terms. All 43 reviews of qualitative studies in our sample had included studies that were available in CINAHL. Br J Occup Ther. PMC CINAHL Disabil Rehabil. Pilot study optimizing MEDLINE queries in an automated disease management telemedicine system. Optimal searches in systematic reviews should search at least Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar as a minimum requirement to guarantee adequate Case studies have suggested that using CINAHL could be essential for reviews of qualitative studies covering topics in the nursing field, but it is unclear whether Searching CINAHL in addition to MEDLINE can add considerably to the resources required for systematic reviews, and it is not clear whether this additional effort can be justified in terms of unique studies identified. EMBASE versus MEDLINE for family medicine searches: can MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree? Though it is generally recommended that searchers search both MEDLINE and Embase, most use MEDLINE as the starting point. Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited. Harrison Dening K, Jones L, Sampson EL. Tjaden L, Tong A, Henning P, Groothoff J, Craig JC. a systematic review and meta-ethnography from the perspective of patients. Searching Medline and CINAHL via EBSCO - Shrewsbury and WebWe used the example of a keyword search to evaluate the usefulness of these databases in biomedical information retrieval and a specific published article to evaluate their utility in performing citation analysis. Both of these reviews [61, 62], written by the same authors, were about the experience of being a kidney donor so not substantially different in topic from the majority of the reviews where CINAHL had appeared to be a good source of primary studies. We found that use of MEDLINE was significantly associated with avoiding all twelve of the adverse events. HIV testing among men who have sex with men (MSM): systematic review of qualitative evidence. Westbrook JI, Coiera EW, Gosling AS. Int J Qual Health Care. Indexing consistency in MEDLINE. One literature review found that predictors of physician information-seeking behavior included the existence of an urgent patient problem and the expectation that a clear answer existed [3]. Using the critical incident technique, the respondents were asked to base their survey responses on a specific patient care situation in which they had searched for information beyond what was available in the patient record, electronic medical record, or lab results. As professionals you will want to use bibliographic databases such as CINAHL and PubMed (MEDLINE) to keep current with the research literature. J Adv Nurs. The written guidance and video tutorial below show how to use advanced searching techniques in CINAHL. Correspondence to (Best viewed using Chrome). Due to the nature and distribution of the nursing literature, it is especially important for the searcher to understand and respond to the focus of the researcher. WebMEDLINE is an index of the biomedical journal literature produced by the National Library of Medicine. 1996 Jul;84(3):402-8. CINAHL - LibGuides at Mayo Clinic Lansing PS, Edmondson ME. Comprehensive journal index to nursing and allied health literature, includes books, nursing dissertations, conference proceedings, practice standards and book chapters. Data from this study add to the body of literature about MEDLINE, demonstrating that MEDLINE is an effective component in providing answers to clinical questions, as it appears more frequently than any other resource with the exception of journals (print and online), and in effectively changing patient care. In addition to nursing, CINAHL is a great database to use for any health related topic, including human biology, exercise science, health administration, public health, and more. Ment Health Relig Cult. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. What is the meta synthesis value in the publication type limiter in CINAHL databases? Comparison of CINAHL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE An official website of the United States government. Atwal A, Spiliotopoulou G, Plastow N, McIntyre A, McKay EA. MEDLINE A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. sharing sensitive information, make sure youre on a federal Gibbins J, Steinhardt K, Beinart H. A systematic review of qualitative studies exploring the experience of parents whose child is diagnosed and treated for cancer. J Immigr Minor Health. 2012;68(9):190919. After screening 58 qualitative systematic reviews identified from the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), we created a sample set of 43 reviews covering a range of topics including patient experience of both illnesses and interventions. In particular, we wanted to assess, What percentage of included studies were available in CINAHL, What percentage of the included studies were unique to CINAHL. McKibbon KA, Fridsma DB. There were two (4.7 %) reviews, however, where the percentage of the included studies available in CINAHL was much lower at 38.5 % and 14.3 %. Bradshaw SA, Playford ED, Riazi A. 2017 Dec 6;6(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y. Answered By: Reference LibrarianMar 29, 2020 55889. Consequently, the findings regarding CINAHLs contribution of unique studies can only be based on 11 (61.0 %) of the 18 reviews (see Additional file 3: Table S3, Number of databases not available for searching). Health Educ Res. Tong A, Chapman JR, Wong G, Kanellis J, McCarthy G, Craig JC. 2012;15(6):63751. Since most respondents reported using multiple resources to answer their clinical questions, we also explored whether using more resources was associated with reported changes to patient care and avoidance of adverse events. Take a few minutes to evaluate all that CINAHL Complete has to offer and you'll see why hundreds of thousands of nurses and allied health professionals rely on this essential resource. 2011;17(4):32331. and CINAHL Wells performed the statistical analysis. A previous study on the use of health information resources for patient care obtained 16,122 responses from health care providers in 56 hospitals about how providers make decisions affecting patient care and the role of information resources in that process. Soc Sci Med. Subirana M, Sol I, Garcia JM, Gich I, Urrtia G. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;28(4):42231. J Health Serv Res Policy. In addition, for 21 % (9/43) of the reviews, all the included studies were available in CINAHL. We found that use of MEDLINE was significantly associated with all eight identified changes to patient care. Where your focus is on Nursing role, this is the database to use. Databases Previous research has either focused on the use of MEDLINE as a single resource or has compared the use of MEDLINE with one other resource [12, 13]. FOIA This limitation is likely to be met by others attempting to carry out a retrospective study of this kind, especially as electronic resources are discontinued and database subscriptions withdrawn. 2012;7(5), e37117. Percent of respondents who used each information resource among those who avoided adverse events as a result of the information obtained in their searches. and transmitted securely. The site is secure. Patients, intimate partners and family experiences of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: qualitative systematic review. 2016 Nov 22;16(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0264-6. Nolan ML. Before First, there seems to be a lack of reviews synthesizing nursing research priorities on a general level. The selection of databases to use for future reviews could be informed by past performance if information about the source of studies was reported more fully. A nursing qualitative systematic review required MEDLINE Subject headings/ Keywords. We carried out a retrospective analysis of a sample of systematic reviews of qualitative studies to investigate CINAHLs potential contribution to identifying the evidence. 2007;57(1):95100. All databases were practical in use and offered numerous search facilities. 2011;127(6):147181. PLoS One. J Med Libr Assoc. Article It was produced by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD), part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) and a department of the University of York. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284518. The combined PubMed/MEDLINE database has been available online since 1966 and continues to be one of the most widely accessible resources for scientists and health care providers. KW conceived of the idea, carried out data extraction, and wrote the research. Created by the United States National Library of Medicine, MEDLINE is an authoritative bibliographic database containing citations and abstracts for biomedical and health journals used by health care professionals, nurses, clinicians and researchers. Demner-Fushman D, Hauser SE, Humphrey SM, Ford GM, Jacobs JL, Thoma GR. Kunzler-Heule P, Panfil E. Hepatitis C! The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The combination of Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, and Google Scholar performed best, achieving an overall recall of 98.3 and 100% recall in 72% of systematic reviews. We found that using a larger number of information resources to answer a clinical question was significantly associated with greater probabilities of making all 8 possible changes to patient care (p<0.05, Figure 2). Use the tabs above for advice and support on: Finding the literature. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. CINAHL and PubMed are two of the most widely used databases in the Health Sciences. In addition, this database offers access to health care books, nursing dissertations, selected conference proceedings, standards of practice, educational software, audiovisuals and book chapters. While wishing to identify all the available relevant studies to minimise potential bias, researchers and information specialists also want to minimise the number of irrelevant records retrieved so the choice of databases is a key decision. 1 DARE search strategy). Do online information retrieval systems help experienced clinicians answer clinical questions? We did consider whether topic could have had any impact upon the likelihood of CINAHLs ability to contribute unique studies but, looking at the 11 reviews where searches of CINAHL could have identified studies not available in other databases, no clear topics or themes emerge. CINAHL & PubMed - Home - Research Guides at Eastern Our findings may encourage other researchers to undertake more detailed studies on the use of multiple information resources. While the aim is to identify specific groups of papers that possess characteristics that are relevant to the phenomenon being studied, this need not imply statistical representativeness. search and transmitted securely. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, 2019 Aug;21(4):853-878. doi: 10.1007/s10903-018-0816-4. Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited. Experience of rehabilitation following spinal cord injury: a meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. King K, Meader N, Wright K, Graham H, Power C, Petticrew M et al.Characteristics of interventions targeting multiple lifestyle risk behaviours in adult populations: a systematic scoping review. Why use it? Preston L, Carroll C, Gardois P, Paisley S, Kaltenthaler E. Syst Rev. Google Scholar. This access is essential, given the little time physicians have to research and answer a clinical question. For a search related to nursing, Medline and CINAHL are the On the contrary, the search engine of CINAHL site is Where the Value of Libraries study reported that using a larger number of information resources was associated with changes in patient care, it did not conduct an in-depth analysis of the impact of an individual resource on patient care or characterize the use of a particular resource relative to other resources. One review investigated nurses experiences of providing services in a primary care setting. Mindfulness. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. Two case studies have looked at CINAHLs performance. Would you like email updates of new search results? The two sides of managing antidepressants: a meta-ethnography of patients experience of antidepressants. 2013 Jan 9;13:7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-7. While physicians still prefer colleagues as their primary source when they first seek an answer to a clinical question [3], when they need information beyond that provided by colleagues, they must often consult multiple sources of information to obtain an answer, ranging from 1.8 resources in an experimental study in which physicians could select any resource of their choosing [5] to as many as 6 resources in a more controlled setting [6]. government site. For all 43 reviews, we found that some of the included studies were available in CINAHL (see Fig. Shaws [ 4] comparison of thesaurus terms for qualitative research across MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Westberg EE, Miller RA. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The search on substance abuse in pregnancy, not restricted to nursing literature, retrieved better results when searching both MEDLINE and EM- BASE. 2008;16(1):1630. What lies behind the wish to hasten death? and transmitted securely. Children's experiences of dialysis: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Phillips L. Improving care for people with learning disabilities in hospital. Examining the role of MEDLINE as a patient care Why use CINAHL? Truncation. Careers. The lack of access to a number of the databases that had been used by the original reviews limits how confident we can be about whether the CINAHL database can identify unique studies for systematic reviews of qualitative studies in topic areas beyond nursing. Careers. We created three sets of variables to assess the relationship between the use of information resources and changes to patient care or avoidance of adverse events. We also used this test set to ensure that there was consistency between the four information specialists carrying out the assessment and data extraction. Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. Syst Rev. The motivations and experiences of living kidney donors: a thematic synthesis. Finding what works in health care: standards for systematic reviews. An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0128-x. Subirana M, Sol I, Garcia JM, Gich I, Urrtia G. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;75(3):11827. Why use it? Other literature-based resources, particularly point-of-care tools, have emerged in the last decade and have played a prominent role in health care providers learning and decision making [16]. Subirana M, Sola I, Garcia JM, Gich I, Urrutia G. A nursing qualitative systematic review required MEDLINE and CINAHL for study identification. We also found some indication that CINAHL had the potential to provide unique studies for systematic reviews. Terms and Conditions, Extending the analysis to include this additional group of studies could be valuable, if it were possible to identify a sufficiently large group. There are two ways to identify UK & Irish articles in CINAHL, CINAHL with Full Text, CINAHL Plus, and CINAHL Complete: Performing a CINAHL Heading country search; Using the Geographic Subset limiter option. Treloar C, Rhodes T. The lived experience of hepatitis C and its treatment among injecting drug users: qualitative synthesis. Medical Center Library, St. John's Mercy Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri 63141. Careers. Nephrol Dial Transplant. One of the consequences of this choice was that we were reliant upon what was reported in the published papers regarding the searching process such as the databases used, database search strategies, supplementary search techniques applied and whether any of the sources had identified unique studies. Although our retrospective analysis showed that for five reviews, all their included studies were available in the CINAHL database, using this information to prospectively select which databases to use in future reviews has limitations. Eden J, Levit L, Berg A, Morton S, Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research, editors. In addition, full text databases such as the Cochrane Library (a database of systematic reviews), textbook resources and electronic journals such as Evidence Based Nursing can provide needed 3, Percentage of papers available in CINAHL). York: CRD, University of York; 2009. 2012;25(5):36375. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health. A systematic approach to searching: an Articles in this journal are licensed under a. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! Verhaeghe N, De Maeseneer J, Maes L, Van Heeringen C, Annemans L. Perceptions of mental health nurses and patients about health promotion in mental health care: a literature review.
Darius Knezevic Happy Valley, Canyon High School Canyon Country, When Will Venus Be In Taurus 2023, St Maurice Church Stamford, Ct, Onu Track And Field Schedule 2023, Articles W