Probably best to start by reporting his comments, he may leave if enough get deleted. These facts are, apparently, not relevant. What I used to call amber ale federal vision should just be called . Attend a worship service at an FV church and you definitely see the resemblance. Lets be completely clear here. Ive read the blog posts and listened to the recordings it sounds to me like both of you believe that one day, in the distant future perhaps, all branches of Christianity will be united and Protestantism (as well as the Roman church) will cease to exist as such. This obviously requires explanation, which I hope to provide here. The people who oppose Trump are rarely genuinely upset about the specific criticism they make in the moment, but just venting general opposition to everything about him, Trump was absolutely the right person for the time and regardless of your thoughts on him, if you don't see why he was needed you are part of the problem, I wouldn't want to get my whole life philosophy from Trump despite him being pretty good on most points. I am troubled first, that anyone looks to Wilson for wisdom on Reformed theology OR conservatism. Quite sad, I noticed during their talks many of Wilson's errors not only in evangelism but in the sacraments in general and white said nothing unless I missed something or a follow-up comment from Mr. White. This happened to such an extent that moderns indoctrinated on civil rights propaganda would be thunderstruck to know the half of it. Within the Reformed stream, there are various projects under way, and I believe there is pretty much room for them all. Jun 28, 2023. By the time of the War, the intellectual leadership of the South was conservative, orthodox, and Christian. Some people refuse to engage with him at all, even where he makes valid points, because of his theological aberrations. I dont care what you call me, just dont call me late for dinner. But youre making Jesus teaching worthless with that kind of statement. In terms of the content of the controversy, what we discovered was that even early Reformers were quite guilty of holding positions that TRs would denounce as heretical. I am trying to pinpoint where I need to seek forgiveness, and this is a distinct operation from simply changing sides, or turning coat. 547 people like this. Adam and Eve, and Judas Isc. That is where I want to concentrate all my energies, and that is what I understand Steve as also wanting to do. I doubt cats hold humans to feline standards. Wilson says he is not a member of the League because he believes the countrys problems need a liturgical and doctrinal solution, not a political or cultural solution. Evangelicals need to stop treating Wilson as a member of the in-group. I should have acknowledged it with great clarity, and I should have been louder. Whats this freedom to use Biblical language thing? Wilson is a white supremacist. Certain things have shaken out during that time, and incipient earlier differences have become very obvious differences. THE 10 BEST Restaurants in Bibbiena (Updated June 2023) - Tripadvisor Doug, as you know Ive stayed almost entirely out of FV discussions since about 2007partly because my calling focuses my attention elsewhere, partly because I found them almost invariably fruitless. Glad to here it. That will simply create yet one more idiosyncratic Christian group expanding, rather than contracting, the divisions in Christendom. My guess is that the current post was theRead more . He also encouraged a parishioner to marry a pedophile and he sided with rapists (as defined by the law) in court. Here is the blog post that your friend may be confused about: Can anyone recommend a good book or article demonstrating that Wilson has not, in fact, renounced the FV? It is simply the recognition that the drums of war were being beaten by the abolitionists, who were in turn driven by a zealous hatred of the Word of God. Aint no logic in that. How much do personal/tribal relationships,Read more . Huntersville Presbyterian Church If you get the definitions of male and female wrong, there are precious few other categories that will remain intact after that. It does not represent any substantial shift or sea change in the content of what I believe. Oops, spoke too soon. il tuo. Could you speak as to who or what this looks like? Now we have Geralt of Riviasome guy who took a break from Manga blogs to come here and try to win the worlds most arrogant Reformed know-it-all title. John Piper - Why Doug Wilson? had clear fruits. Your post here demonstrates similar grace,Read more , > in fact I am a firm believer in the Protestant ressourcement project under way in various places because I dont believe we have even cataloged all the options that Reformed Christians have developed in the past. The Puritan Board is a forum dedicated to the discussion of Christian theology in a Confessionally Reformed context. Does he have something over them? A Question for Doug Wilson Fans - The Aquila Report As well as those inclined to respond to him. The destruction gathers over time and can look like the path of a tornado if left to go too long. I got a better understanding of Reformed theology and worked through the problems of the Federal Vision. Well said. So this does not mean piety gone to seed, as in moralistic pietism. Our Pennsylvania correspondent sent me a piece that Doug Wilson posted about church officers who voted for President Obama:. The FV controversy exposed that many Reformed are, sadly, Reformed before they are Christian, in terms of their primary devotion toRead more . I applaud with gusto! ! till I read, Thus when I speak of the objectivity of the covenantwhich I will still continue to do. Lets recall how Markos described this pamphlet: [Wilson has been criticized] for his utopian views of the Old South, as outlined in a 1996 pamphlet he co-authored. Dr. White has basically made a second career out of . Unlike some of his critics, I do not believe he is going to Rome, but I do believe it is a project, and it does have a destination. There were insightful critics and there were bigoted ones, and I should have given the insightful critics more of a fair hearing than I did, and I should have used the behavior of the ignorant critics as less representative than I frequently did. Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser. Please support my writing! Think about the damage that does. Speaking as an EFCA theological examiner: It is my understanding that the Reformed movement has always believed in the objectivity of the covenant. 4. We dont need to hurl anathemas at one another over any of thisbut neither do we need to be calling them by the same names. But with that being said, I think setting aside the term might be the right strategic move. Doug Wilson and Deniers of Sola Fide Patrick Hines Bridwell Heights Presbyterian Church 00:00 01:25:56 The Federal Vision's Rejection of Historic Calvinism, Part 1 by Brian Schwertley (Free MP3) The Federal Vision's Rejection of Historic Calvinism, Part 1 Brian Schwertley Covenanted Reformed Presbyterian Church 00:00 58:21 I wish I were making this up, but Im not. There is no way out for us apart from a massive reformation of liturgy and doctrine in the evangelical church nationwide. Because there was a general melee, in the middle of it I did not want to say or write anything that would be twisted and used against me or my friends. I don't think that many confessional Presbyterian denominations would accept Baptist ordination if a Baptist preacher becomes a Presbyterian and is called by a congregation. This will bring everyone together in one big happy family! Wilsons response was essentially: No. The folks in the League are good diagnosticians. I would hope, though, that you would agree that not only Rick Phillips Dick Gaffin, and I sought to be fair-minded but also Chris Hutchinson, George Knight, Joey Pipa, Carl Robbins, Morton Smith, and Fowler White, all participants in the Knox-sponsored colloquium I led (with you and John Barach, Peter Leithart, Rich Lusk, Steve Schlissel, Tom Trouwborst, andRead more , Wilson may be ready to acknowledge, in Beisner, Waters and others, a certain desire to seriously guide the Church through controversy. What I don't care for is when it's not based on a specific teaching but just because we don't like him and then acting like he's never done anything good. What hai reputation like among outsiders? Federal Vision No Mas | Blog & Mablog First, it was a consensus document. Why? He's dangerous, but no more so than the church fathers some here seem to hold in unnecessarily high esteem. Did they struggle and suffer for Christ instead of taking the easy route? This would keep those involved in stating and defending the original FV statement on the hook to continue to do so, or else explicitly amend theirRead more . Waters? It is difficult, but I still should have done a better job. One can believe in the classic evangelical doctrine of regeneration (a once and for all transformation of a persons nature from being a son of the Devil to a son of God) and traditional Calvinism and still take the warning passages seriously. This does not mean, however, that we must subscribe to the flawed Jacobin notion of egalitarianism, nor does it mean that white Southerners should give control over their civilization and its institutions to another race,whether it be native blacks or Hispanic immigrants. I am making this lexical shift for the sake of clarity and communicationdefining more precisely what was already there. They know it wouldnt be fair. Lutherans and Baptists both believe in the deity of Christ and in justification by faith alonebut Lutherans are still Lutherans all the way down. Things evangelical journalists apparently cant do. Examining Doug Wilson & Moscow, Idaho - Facebook His response to everything is, "How do you know?"). So one of the few things I have been successful at doing is persuading a number of people that I am a sly fellow, and one who bears close watching. Certainly! . It would have been much easier, and less risky, for owners of large plantations to keep a mistress in town than to risk the possibility of the destruction of his own family by taking up with a slave woman. Im not a pastor, and my church heritage isnt the WCF so I really dont know. Sure, Stalin gave his kids bread and Im sure Idi Amin did a few nice things. Doug Wilson. I used to believe I had to refute a specific philosophical point to be able to question someone's position. Of course what repentance needs to happen shouldnt be delayed. Who knows? He argues that it would be racist to suggest that slave men would have let white masters and overseers have their way with their women. He has not repudiated the essence of FV, merely the name. Since you were willing to put up with the backhanded, disingenuous, barely within the bounds of civility insulting snark of 40 Acres, may I ask if Geralt of Rivias overt abuse and slander crosses the line of unacceptability to the point of banning? My question is has Doug Wilson changed? The first one, and the one that everyone associates with prophesy, is the declaration of what was going to to come to pass in the future. Over the years, I have grown increasingly upset that evangelicals like Markos and the editors at Christianity Today continue to reference and lean on Wilson as some sort of prescient theological giant without acknowledging his rank racism. My reasoning was simple: I hadnt learned these things from Calvin, I did not want to participate in any Paul/Apollos competitions, I just wanted to be biblical, etc. But even in the midst of everything, I did find some things on the federal vision side of things worrisome, and in the same way as did some of our critics. The accusation, though, was bought by reformed folk after the article of Vice went public. I've been engaging with Wilson since 2003. Indeed, Wilson does not believe that the practice of slavery is unbiblical. Drop anchor verbally into the solid rock of the thing. That tribe over there dislikes this; they are obnoxious and unjust, and are mean to my friends; their ideas are no good. And those nice acts the ones that anyone does those come from the devil? That comment made me laugh out loud! But then a third tribe appears the critical but respected and respectful tribe. Bar Pasticceria Dei F.lli Del Sere. You are using an out of date browser. I would like to say I am joking. They are Clintonesque (what do you mean by "is") with the same motivation, to hide the plain truth. You are using an out of date browser. Since we appear to be heading back to Reformed sectarianism, shouldnt we reserve those titles for R.C Sproul and some of the Westminster professors? Well done. I hear this alot in connection with him? being done in even the most liturgical Presbyterian churchesas far as I know. But every part of this needs to be balanced by the rest, and so I would ask everyone who reads part of this to make sure they read the whole thing. I disagree about 40 Acres. ButRead more , Those who block or report him reveal, to my mind, not so much that they are trying to maintain civil discourse, but that they require a safe space from the mere presence of ideas they simply cannot countenance. Your assessment is wanting. But hes moving in that direction; which is why we love him. Tuesday, January 17, 2017 by Douglas Wilson - 162 comments Sharing Options Show Outline with Links Introduction I have decided, after mulling over it for some years now, to discontinue identifying myself with what has come to be called the federal vision. Nor does it mean the kind of confessionalism intended by some, where they dont believe you can possibly understand the Heidelberg unless you can read it in the original Arabic. You cant be human without clear fruits. The reason I ask is because I am seeing many reformed Baptists not only recommend him but cite him frequently. It used to be that when I was asked if I held to the federal vision, I would say something like yes, if by that you mean . Why are there questions? We would love to have you be . Patrick Hines | Bridwell Heights Presbyterian Church. Here is a link to the start of Wilsons review of Guy Waters book, referenced above: https://dougwils.com/s16-theology/guy-waters.html My impression at the time was that both Beisner and Waters committed one mistake after another, and completely missed the central issues. I mean good god, this is Wilsons pamphlet: Slavery as it existed in the South was not an adversarial relationship with pervasive racial animosity. Historical documents confirm that the foundation of Bibbiena dates back to the year 979; shortly thereafter, the first . Try SermonAudio 2.0 BETA site! Is Douglas Wilson dangerous? | The Puritan Board A great deal of the federal vision controversy was tangled and confused, and this certainly included many of those who were attacking the federal vision. I just believe that on a Christian page, the level of discourse should be Christian, not uncharitable, rude, falsely accusatory, and disrespectful of others. Because of its dominantly patriarchal character, it was a relationship based upon mutual affection and confidence. Thanks! I have a Patreon! Being a mans gameRead more , Fair enough. JavaScript is disabled. What they really know is post-Martin-Luther-nailing-theses-on-church-door history. Furthermore, our surrender would ultimately be regretted by all parties as the remaining liberties were squandered by those who had no desire to preserve the Eurocentric, (and therefore racist), institution of the rule of law. Except the last paragraph I dont think thats quite whats going on here but its not that important a disagreement. DW is a charmer, a charismatic personality type who knows how to gather a following; which is how he took over leadership of the church he attended, and made himself a pastor; and afterward, successfully brought in other churches to join his "federation," in which he continues as the top-dog. Could you explain why James White is dangerous? Its almost like we can actually have them. If youve read enough already, feel free to stop here. (Can't say about Bruggencate. Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser. Thats not even close to happening, though. In fact it is tragically ironic that Wolterstorff himself recently surrendered to the goo thought of pomosexuality. And Wilson, who now calls himself a paleo-conservative and continues to argue that the antebellum South was the last truly Christian nation of the West, co-wrote a book with him praising the institution of slavery as practiced in the antebellum South. And yes, you should feel sick right now. The last week has been hard to avoid him. It may not display this or other websites correctly. I have found myself in movements whose trajectory clearly indicated they were headed where I was not willing to go but disengaging can be a difficult and long process. I honestly never think about Wilson until someone brings him up here or on Facebook or on the rare occasion now at church. Dear Doug, Based on the amount of qualification typed out (and required) over the years, this step makes sense. That doesnt fit at all :). James White, Sye Ten Bruggencate, John Piper, RC Sproul and Jeff Durbin are all friends of Wilson and are rock solid on Justification. Look at the schools. We were saying the same thing in 2015. And that brings us to the second point. What additional distinctives beyond what you signed which (sometimes) now fall under federal vision have resulted in motivating you to shift yourself away from being labeled as one belonging to federal vision despite there still being no substantial shift from what youve believed/signed pertaining to federal vision? Not to mention heretical and at times blasphemous. You won't find justice there. The Plodcast | Blog & Mablog Here of course, I have to add my own descriptive, Intellect is interesting, but Grace is amazing. I have always thought that your dad exhibited about as much grace as I have ever seen a human being show. The League of the South participated in a funeral in 1995 at which Hill, referring to African Americans, spoke of elicit rights bestowed on a compliant and deadly underclass that now fulfills a role similar to that of Hitlers brown-shirted street thugs in the 1930s.. Nor does it flinch and hold back where Kuyper himself did, advocating a secular state. No church's elders are permitted to require masks of their congregants. has clear fruits and still walks away. What, is freedom something only white people crave? The credit for this must go to the predominance of Christianity. Presbyterians think they know Church history. It's not even supported by scripture. DW is not accountable the way pastors in an actual P&R denomination are--not to the elders of his congregation, not to a wider church. Who is unaware of this fact of experience? Gary is the father of Natalie Rose Greenfield**, the young woman who was sexually abused by one of Wilson's students from 2000-2003 when she was 13-16 years old. He could not yet speak and, pale with jealousy and bitterness, glared at his brother sharing his mothers milk. Is Pastor Douglas Wilson a Pastor? I think its only Doug moderating, and he doesnt seem interested it policeing the tamber of the comment section. I completely agree on the justification, justification justification, grace, grace and more grace part. Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen. Wilson is racist. This is not complicated. Speaking for myself, I need no safe space from ideas I disagree with. The Puritan Board is a forum dedicated to the discussion of Christian theology in a Confessionally Reformed context. Follow up questions are to be expected, but I hope to make the general point clear. There has never been a multi-racial society which has existed with such mutual intimacy and harmony in the history of the world. Specifically, My former churches elder board was a fan of him. Denying it was communicating truth to nobody, except to communicate the possible truth that I was not to be trusted with the ecclesiastical silver. BETA. May a Christian own slaves, even when this makes him a part of a larger pagan system which is not fully scriptural, or perhaps not scriptural at all? That's an important point when dealing with FVers (or those that say they aren't but really are).
Are Unions Still Relevant Today, Articles I